Evaluation of Diffusion–Perfusion Mismatch in Acute Ischemic Stroke with a New Automated Perfusion-Weighted Imaging Software: A Retrospective Study
Yunyun Xiong, Yu Luo, Mingming Wang, Shih-Ting Yang, Ruiqiong Shi, Wanxing Ye, Guangshuo Li, Kaixuan Yang, Shang Wang, Zixiao Li, Yongjun Wang
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of automated software (iStroke) on magnetic resonance (MR) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) against ground truth in assessing infarct core, and compare the hypoperfusion volume and mismatch volume on iStroke with those on Food and Drug Administration-approved software (RAPID) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: /s and hypoperfusion volume was defined as Tmax > 6 s. We compared the accuracy of infarct core volume using iStroke and RAPID (iSchema View Inc, Menlo Park, CA) software with ground truth. RESULTS: We included 405 patients with acute ischemic stroke with MR ADC and PWI sequences. The infarct core volume on iStroke (median 2.43 ml, interquartile range [IQR] 0.60-10.32 ml) was not significantly different from the ground truth (median 2.89 ml, IQR 0.77-9.17 ml) (P = 0.07); Bland-Altman curves showed that the core volume of iStroke and RAPID software were comparable with each other on individual agreement with ground truth. The hypoperfusion volume and mismatch volume on iStroke were not statistically different from those on the RAPID software, respectively. In patients with large vessel occlusion (n = 74), the agreement between iStroke and RAPID was substantial (kappa = 0.76) according to DEFUSE 3 criteria (infarct core < 70 ml, mismatch volume ≥ 15 ml, and mismatch ratio ≥ 1.8). CONCLUSIONS: The iStroke automatic processing of ADC and PWI is a reliable software for the identification of diffusion-perfusion mismatch in acute ischemic stroke.