Litcius/Paper detail

Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study

Mario Matute‐González, Anna Darnell, Marc Comas‐Cufí, Javier Pazó, Alexandre Soler, Belén Saborido, Ezequiel Mauro, Juan Turnés, Alejandro Forner, María Reig, Jordi Rimola

2024Insights into Imaging22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a domain-specific large language model (LLM) for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of hepatic observations based on free-text descriptions extracted from MRI reports. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 291 small liver observations, divided into training (n = 141), validation (n = 30), and test (n = 120) datasets. Of these, 120 were fictitious, and 171 were extracted from 175 MRI reports from a single institution. The algorithm's performance was compared to two independent radiologists and one hepatologist in a human replacement scenario, and considering two combined strategies (double reading with arbitration and triage). Agreement on LI-RADS category and dichotomic malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, and LR-M) were estimated using linear-weighted κ statistics and Cohen's κ, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were calculated. The consensus agreement of three other radiologists served as the ground truth. RESULTS: The model showed moderate agreement against the ground truth for both LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42-0.65]) and the dichotomized approach (κ = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.42-0.73]). Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00), respectively. When the chatbot was used as a triage tool, performance improved for LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.86/0.87 for the two independent radiologists and κ = 0.76 for the hepatologist), dichotomized malignancy (κ = 0.94/0.91 and κ = 0.87) and LR-5 identification (1.00/0.98 and 0.85 sensitivity, 0.96/0.92 and 0.92 specificity), with no statistical significance compared to the human readers' individual performance. Through this strategy, the workload decreased by 45%. CONCLUSION: LI-RADS v2018 categorization from unlabelled MRI reports is feasible using our LLM, and it enhances the efficiency of data curation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our proof-of-concept study provides novel insights into the potential applications of LLMs, offering a real-world example of how these tools could be integrated into a local workflow to optimize data curation for research purposes. KEY POINTS: Automatic LI-RADS categorization from free-text reports would be beneficial to workflow and data mining. LiverAI, a GPT-4-based model, supported various strategies improving data curation efficiency by up to 60%. LLMs can integrate into workflows, significantly reducing radiologists' workload.

Topics & Concepts

TriageCategorizationMedicineMalignancyRadiologyBI-RADSNatural language processingNeuroradiologyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceInternal medicineCancerMammographyBreast cancerEmergency medicinePsychiatryNeurologyRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisRadiology practices and education
Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study | Litcius