Translational value of preclinical models for renal denervation: a histological comparison of human versus porcine renal nerve anatomy
Yu Sato, Andrew S.P. Sharp, Felix Mahfoud, Stefan Tunev, Ashley Forster, Matthew J. Ellis, Ana M. Gómez, Roma Dhingra, Jeremy Ullman, Markus P. Schlaich, David Lee, Julie Trudel, Douglas A. Hettrick, David E. Kandzari, Renu Virmani, Aloke V. Finn
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preclinical models have provided key insights into the response of local tissues to radiofrequency (RF) renal denervation (RDN) that is unobtainable from human studies. However, the anatomic translatability of these models to the procedure in humans is incompletely understood. Aims: We aimed to compare the renal arterial anatomy in normotensive pigs treated with RF-RDN to that of human cadavers to evaluate the suitability of normotensive pigs for determining the safety of RF-RDN. METHODS: bifurcation sections were 65, 58, 47, 22.5, and 14.7 in humans, respectively, and 39, 26, 29, 16.5, and 9.3 in the porcine models, respectively). Renal nerves were common in the regions between arteries and adjacent veins, but only 3% and 13% of the renal nerves in humans and pigs, respectively, were located behind the renal vein. The semiquantitative score of RF-induced renal arterial nerve necrosis was significantly greater at 7 days than 28 days (0.98 vs 0.75; p=0.01), and injury to surrounding organs was rarely observed. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of nerve tissue and the relative distribution of extravascular anatomic structures along the renal artery was similar between humans and pigs, which validates the translational value of the normotensive porcine model for RDN.