Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study

Qi Zhang, Lei Lei, Aiqian Zhang, Lingxiao Zou, Dabao Xu

2021Annals of Translational Medicine19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery in patients with previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on women who underwent laparoscopic or hysteroscopic surgery for PCSD from 2016 to 2019 at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Among these participants, 13 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 33 received hysteroscopic surgery. RESULTS: 9,547.1±4,747.2 yuan, P<0.05) between the laparoscopic surgery and hysteroscopic group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of clinical efficacy between the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery group. A total of 2 of the 4 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group, and 9 of 11 patients in the hysteroscopic surgery group delivered successfully. All 2 participants in the laparoscopic surgery group and 2 participants in the hysteroscopic surgery group were diagnosed with placenta previa. No uterine rupture was reported in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Both laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery are safe and effective treatments for PCSD patients, and hysteroscopic surgery is more efficient for PCSD patients.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineLaparoscopic surgeryRetrospective cohort studySurgeryBlood lossIncidence (geometry)HysteroscopyLaparoscopyOpticsPhysicsMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPelvic floor disorders treatmentsCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery