Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluation of CNV detection tools for NGS panel data in genetic diagnostics

José Marcos Moreno-Cabrera, Jesús Del Valle, Elisabeth Castellanos, Lídia Feliubadaló, Marta Pineda, Joan Brunet, Eduard Serra, Gabriel Capellá, Conxi Lázaro, Bernat Gel

2020European Journal of Human Genetics125 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Although germline copy-number variants (CNVs) are the genetic cause of multiple hereditary diseases, detecting them from targeted next-generation sequencing data (NGS) remains a challenge. Existing tools perform well for large CNVs but struggle with single and multi-exon alterations. The aim of this work is to evaluate CNV calling tools working on gene panel NGS data and their suitability as a screening step before orthogonal confirmation in genetic diagnostics strategies. Five tools (DECoN, CoNVaDING, panelcn.MOPS, ExomeDepth, and CODEX2) were tested against four genetic diagnostics datasets (two in-house and two external) for a total of 495 samples with 231 single and multi-exon validated CNVs. The evaluation was performed using the default and sensitivity-optimized parameters. Results showed that most tools were highly sensitive and specific, but the performance was dataset dependant. When evaluating them in our diagnostics scenario, DECoN and panelcn.MOPS detected all CNVs with the exception of one mosaic CNV missed by DECoN. However, DECoN outperformed panelcn.MOPS specificity achieving values greater than 0.90 when using the optimized parameters. In our in-house datasets, DECoN and panelcn.MOPS showed the highest performance for CNV screening before orthogonal confirmation. Benchmarking and optimization code is freely available at https://github.com/TranslationalBioinformaticsIGTP/CNVbenchmarkeR .

Topics & Concepts

Copy-number variationBenchmarkingComputer scienceComputational biologyMolecular diagnosticsGeneticsBiologyGeneGenomeMarketingBusinessGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesCancer Genomics and Diagnostics