Litcius/Paper detail

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Sensitivity of Antibody Tests for the Laboratory Confirmation of COVID-19

Makoah N. Aminake, Thomas Tipih, Matefo M Litabe, Mareza Brink, Joseph B. Sempa, Dominique Goedhals, Felicity J. Burt

2021Future Virology24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 during the first week of symptom onset in patients confirmed with the real-time RT-PCR. Materials & methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 58 publications were performed using data obtained from Academic Search Ultimate, Africa-wide, Scopus, Web of Science and MEDLINE. Results: We found that the highest pooled sensitivities were obtained with ELISA immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG and chemiluminescence immunoassay IgM tests. Conclusion: Serological tests have low sensitivity within the first week of symptom onset and cannot replace nucleic acid amplification tests. However, serological assays can be used to support nucleic acid amplification tests.

Topics & Concepts

SerologyMeta-analysisCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineAntibodySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Web of scienceNucleic Acid Amplification TestsChemiluminescenceImmunoassayVirologyImmunologyInternal medicineChemistryDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)ChromatographyChlamydia trachomatisSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Sensitivity of Antibody Tests for the Laboratory Confirmation of COVID-19 | Litcius