Litcius/Paper detail

Primal/Dual Descent Methods for Dynamics

Miles Macklin, Kenny Erleben, Matthias Müller, Nuttapong Chentanez, Stefan Jeschke, T.Y. Kim

2020Computer Graphics Forum36 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract We examine the relationship between primal, or force‐based, and dual, or constraint‐based formulations of dynamics. Variational frameworks such as Projective Dynamics have proved popular for deformable simulation, however they have not been adopted for contact‐rich scenarios such as rigid body simulation. We propose a new preconditioned frictional contact solver that is compatible with existing primal optimization methods, and competitive with complementarity‐based approaches. Our relaxed primal model generates improved contact force distributions when compared to dual methods, and has the advantage of being differentiable, making it well‐suited for trajectory optimization. We derive both primal and dual methods from a common variational point of view, and present a comprehensive numerical analysis of both methods with respect to conditioning. We demonstrate our method on scenarios including rigid body contact, deformable simulation, and robotic manipulation.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceSolverDual (grammatical number)Mathematical optimizationInterior point methodComplementarity (molecular biology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Contact forceDifferentiable functionMathematicsAlgorithmGeometryMathematical analysisBiologyGeneticsQuantum mechanicsArtLiteraturePhysicsDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems