Risk Factor-Based Screening for Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review
Ayana Tadesse Korsa, Wubshet Tesfaye, Kamal Sud, Ines Krass, Ronald L. Castelino
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Kidney failure can be prevented or delayed if chronic kidney disease (CKD) is detected and treated early. Targeted screening has been shown effective in detecting CKD worldwide, but a recently updated summary of evidence is lacking. We synthesized up-to-date evidence of the effectiveness of risk factor-based screening for the early detection of CKD among adults in primary care. Study Design: We retrieved articles from Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus. Relevant gray literature and hand-searching bibliographies of key articles were also performed. Setting & Study Populations: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least 1 known CKD risk factor in primary care. Selection Criteria for Studies: Prospective studies applying CKD screening in adults based on at least 1 CKD risk factor. Data Extraction: Data were abstracted from full texts and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Analytical Approach: No meta-analysis was conducted. Results: In total, 24 studies from 11 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Diverse screening tests, CKD definitions, formulas for estimating kidney function, and positive screening test cutoffs were used. Most studies (n = 22) employed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) (n = 14), and dipstick urinalysis (n = 9) for screening. The prevalence of reduced kidney function and/or kidney damage was between 2.9% and 56%, and confirmed CKD varied from 4.4% to 17.1%. Increased patient referrals and physician visits, higher patient satisfaction, and some form of patient willingness to pay for the services were reported because of screening. Limitations: Meta-analysis was not conducted, and the findings might not be generalized to resource-limited settings. Conclusions: Risk factor-based screening effectively identifies a substantial proportion of people with undiagnosed CKD, but there is still scope for improvement. We recommend future studies have robust designs and multidimensional interventions to establish the effectiveness of targeted CKD screening in primary care.