Support Vector Regression Application for the Flight Dynamics New Modelling of the UAS-S4

Abstract

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-2576.vid Having access to an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Flight Dynamics Model (FDM) enhances our ability to evaluate its controller performance in the early development phases, which boosts safety while reducing costs. With this aim, the flight tests are normally carried for a pre-established number of flight conditions. Then, mathematical methods are used to obtain the FDM for the entire flight envelope. For our UAS-S4 Ehecatl, we utilized 216 local FDMs corresponding to 216 trim flight conditions. The initial flight envelope data containing 216 local FDMs was then augmented using interpolation and extrapolation methodologies; the three closest neighbors of the supposed original operating point in the flight envelope were firstly obtained. Then, the centroid of the embedding local FDMs was computed. Lastly, the new FDM was generated through interpolation and extrapolation between the centroid and the original operating point. Following this procedure, the number of trimmed local FDMs was augmented up to 3,642. Relying on the augmented dataset, the Support Vector Machine methodology was used as the benchmarking regression algorithm due to its excellent ability when training samples can not be separated linearly. The trained Support Vector Regression model predicted the FDM for the entire flight envelope. For validation studies, the quality of predicted UAS-S4 FDM is evaluated based on the Root Locus diagram. The predicted eigenvalues closeness to the original eigenvalues, confirmed the high accuracy of our developed UAS-S4 FDM. The SVR prediction accuracy was evaluated in different flight conditions, for different number of neighbours, while a variety of kernel functions were also considered. Besides, the regression performance was analyzed based on the state variables step response in the closed-loop control architecture. By utilizing the developed UAS-S4 FDM instead of the initial one, the controller could provide 0.76 faster rise-time, 1.05 faster settling time, and 0.105% less over-shoot for the pitch angle. The UAS-S4 state variables step response properties validated that the developed flight envelope could provide more accurate FDM compared to the initial one for the Linear Quadratic Regulator.

Topics & Concepts