Improving Jarvis Canopy Resistance Model by Modifying the Effective Leaf Area Index in a Venlo‐Type Greenhouse
Jian‐Hui Jiang, Biyu Wang, Haofang Yan, Chuan Zhang, Jianyun Zhang, Guoqing Wang, Shaowei Liang, Shuaishuai Deng, Yudong Zhou
Abstract
ABSTRACT Canopy resistance ( r c ) is a vital parameter for further estimating crop evapotranspiration ( ET c ), and Jarvis model is one of the most widely used models to estimate r c with parameterizations based on the environmental factors and leaf area index ( LAI ). However, previous researches on the Jarvis model mainly focused on optimising environmental parameters, which could not explain the great fitting disparity for the r c estimations of distinct crop species and the uncertain model performances in different growing stages. Therefore, we modified the effective leaf area index ( LAI e ) in Jarvis model using a multi‐layer method in which we measured stomatal resistance ( r s ) and LAI at different layers (0–50, 50–100, 100–150 and 150–200 cm of plant height) of greenhouse cucumber to calculate LAI e to describe the influences of leaf spatial distribution and photosynthesis efficiency. We compared the performances of the improved and the original Jarvis models on r c estimation and found the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and root mean squared error ( RMSE ) of 0.68 and 163 s m −1 , 0.64 and 171 s m −1 , respectively, the corresponding errors for hourly ET c calculation were 0.81 and 0.10 mm h −1 , 0.88 and 0.098 mm h −1 , respectively. The accuracy of both models gradually raised with the increasing in LAI , and an obvious improvement on ET c estimation appeared when LAI ≤ 1 m 2 m −2 with R 2 = 0.81 for the improved Jarvis model while R 2 = 0.77 for the original Jarvis model. Although the accuracy of the improved Jarvis model was not prominently increased for all growing stages, the improved Jarvis model is of great significance in considerations of crop physiological and growth diversity to enhance the model adaptability for distinct crops and reduce the uncertainty of model performance for different growing stages.