Clinical evaluation of corneal ulcer with a portable and smartphone-attachable slit lamp device: Smart Eye Camera
Sadegh Ghafarian, Ahmad Masoumi, Seyed Ali Tabatabaei, Mehdi Yaseri, Eisuke Shimizu, Shintaro Nakayama, Rohan Khemlani, Hiroki Nishimura, Hassan Asadigandomani
Abstract
Corneal ulcer is one of the most important ophthalmic emergencies. A portable, recordable, and smartphone-attachable slit-lamp device called the "Smart Eye Camera" (SEC) is introduced to compare evaluating corneal ulcers between the SEC and the conventional slit-lamp. A total of 110 participants were included in the study, consisting of 55 patients with corneal ulcers and 55 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers as controls. The participants were first subjected to examination by a conventional slit lamp. The video recording with SEC and imaging with a slit lamp were done by a non-medical person. Both SEC videos and slit-lamp photos were reported by two independent ophthalmologists and compared with a slit-lamp examination as a gold standard. The average age of the study participants was 48.85 ± 20.45 years and 68 participants (61.8%) were male. All corneal ulcers were detected by two ophthalmologists using SEC. Ulcer size evaluated in slit lamp and SEC horizontally (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC); 0.90, 95% CI; 0.84-0.94) and vertically (ICC; 0.90, 95% CI; 0.84-0.94) is correlated about 90%. Hypopyon size (ICC; 0.95, 95% CI; 0.92-0.97), and corneal epithelial defect (CED) size horizontally (ICC; 0.94, 95% CI; 0.91-0.96) and vertically (ICC; 0.94, 95% CI; 0.91-0.96) also correlated about 94%. The infiltration pattern evaluated by SEC was consistent with the pattern evaluated in slit lamps in more than 80% of patients. The SEC is so accurate in diagnosing corneal ulcers and its reliability makes it a valuable telemedicine device.