Litcius/Paper detail

Accurate Determination of the Bandgap Energy of the Rare-Earth Niobate Series

Alka B. Garg, David Vie, P. Rodríguez‐Hernández, Alfonso Muñoz, A. Segura, Daniel Errandonea

2023The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters68 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We report diffuse reflectivity measurements in InNbO 4, ScNbO 4, YNbO 4, and eight rare-earth niobates. A comparison with established values of the bandgap of InNbO 4 and ScNbO 4 shows that Tauc plot analysis gives erroneous estimates of the bandgap energy. Conversely, accurate results are obtained considering excitonic contributions using the Elliot–Toyozawa model. The bandgaps are 3.25 eV for CeNbO 4, 4.35 eV for LaNbO 4, 4.5 eV for YNbO 4, and 4.73–4.93 eV for SmNbO 4, EuNbO 4, GdNbO 4, DyNbO 4, HoNbO 4, and YbNbO 4 . The fact that the bandgap energy is affected little by the rare-earth substitution from SmNbO 4 to YbNbO 4 and the fact that they have the largest bandgap are a consequence of the fact that the band structure near the Fermi level originates mainly from Nb 4d and O 2p orbitals. YNbO 4, CeVO 4, and LaNbO 4 have smaller bandgaps because of the contribution from rare-earth atom 4d, 5d, or 4f orbitals to the states near the Fermi level.

Topics & Concepts

Band gapRare earthMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsFermi levelAtom (system on chip)Electronic band structureAtomic orbitalAtomic physicsPhysicsOptoelectronicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsEmbedded systemMetallurgyElectronLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsNuclear materials and radiation effects
Accurate Determination of the Bandgap Energy of the Rare-Earth Niobate Series | Litcius