Litcius/Paper detail

Cost-effectiveness of routine adolescent vaccination with an M72/AS01E-like tuberculosis vaccine in South Africa and India

Rebecca C. Harris, Matthew Quaife, Chathika K. Weerasuriya, Gabriela B. Gomez, Tom Sumner, Fiammetta Bozzani, Richard G. White

2022Nature Communications25 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract The M72/AS01 E tuberculosis vaccine showed 50% (95%CI: 2–74%) efficacy in a phase 2B trial in preventing active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, but potential cost-effectiveness of adolescent immunisation is unknown. We estimated the impact and cost-effectiveness of six scenarios of routine adolescent M72/AS01 E -like vaccination in South Africa and India. All scenarios suggested an M72/AS01 E -like vaccine would be highly (94–100%) cost-effective in South Africa compared to a cost-effectiveness threshold of $2480/disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. For India, a prevention of disease vaccine, effective irrespective of recipient’s M. tuberculosis infection status at time of administration, was also highly likely (92–100%) cost-effective at a threshold of $264/DALY averted; however, a prevention of disease vaccine, effective only if the recipient was already infected, had 0–6% probability of cost-effectiveness. In both settings, vaccinating 50% of 18 year-olds was similarly cost-effective to vaccinating 80% of 15 year-olds, and more cost-effective than vaccinating 80% of 10 year-olds. Vaccine trials should include adolescents to ensure vaccines can be delivered to this efficient-to-target population.

Topics & Concepts

TuberculosisVaccinationMedicineTuberculosis vaccinesVirologyMycobacterium tuberculosisPathologyTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyVaccine Coverage and HesitancyHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life