Litcius/Paper detail

SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Spike-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion Differ in Their Requirements for Receptor Expression and Proteolytic Activation

Bojan F. Hörnich, Anna K. Großkopf, Sarah Schlagowski, Matthias Tenbusch, Hannah Kleine‐Weber, Frank Neipel, Christiane Stahl‐Hennig, Alexander S. Hahn

2021Journal of Virology116 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Cell-cell fusion allows viruses to infect neighboring cells without the need to produce free virus and contributes to tissue damage by creating virus-infected syncytia. Our results demonstrate that the S2' cleavage site is essential for activation by TMPRSS2 and unravel important differences between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, among those, greater dependence of SARS-CoV-2 on ACE2 expression and activation by metalloproteases for cell-cell fusion. Bromhexine, reportedly an inhibitor of TMPRSS2, is currently being tested in clinical trials against coronavirus disease 2019. Our results indicate that bromhexine enhances fusion under some conditions. We therefore caution against the use of bromhexine in high dosages until its effects on SARS-CoV-2 spike activation are better understood. The related compound ambroxol, which similarly to bromhexine is clinically used as an expectorant, did not exhibit activating effects on cell-cell fusion. Both compounds exhibited weak inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 infection at high concentrations, which might be clinically attainable for ambroxol.

Topics & Concepts

BiologyCell fusionTMPRSS2ProteasesCellLipid bilayer fusionCell biologyHEK 293 cellsMetalloproteinaseFurinFusion proteinProteaseMolecular biologyCell cultureVirologyVirusMatrix metalloproteinaseBiochemistryCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeneRecombinant DNAGeneticsEnzymeDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)MedicinePathologySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing