Litcius/Paper detail

Auditing the Editor: A Review of Key Translational Issues in Epigenetic Editing

Katherine Huerne, Nicole Palmour, Angela Ruohao Wu, Stephan Beck, Alison Berner, Reiner Siebert, Yann Joly

2022The CRISPR Journal17 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Currently, most advances in site-specific epigenetic editing for human use are concentrated in basic research, yet, there is considerable interest to translate this technology beyond the bench. This review highlights recent developments with epigenetic editing technology in comparison with the canonical CRISPR-Cas genome editing, as well as the epistemic and ethical considerations with preemptive translation of epigenetic editing into clinical or commercial use in humans. Key considerations in safety, equity, and access to epigenetic editing are highlighted, with a spotlight on the ethical, legal, and social issues of this technology in the context of global health equity.

Topics & Concepts

EpigeneticsGenome editingCRISPREquity (law)Bench to bedsideContext (archaeology)Engineering ethicsComputer scienceData scienceComputational biologyPolitical scienceBiologyMedicineGeneticsEngineeringGenePaleontologyMedical physicsLawCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchBiomedical Ethics and Regulation