Litcius/Paper detail

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Techniques: A Systematic Review

Harrison Faulkner, Vincent V.G. An, Richard D. Lawson, David J. Graham, Brahman Sivakumar

2021Hand10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a salvage option in the management of end-stage PIPJ arthropathy. Numerous techniques have been described, including screws, Kirschner wires, tension band wiring, intramedullary devices, and plate fixation. There remains no consensus as to the optimum method, and no recent summary of the literature exists. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. English-language articles reporting PIPJ arthrodesis outcomes were included and presented in a systematic review. Pearson χ 2 and 2-sample proportion tests were used to compare fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate between arthrodesis techniques. The mean fusion time ranged from 5.1 to 12.9 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in fusion time between arthrodesis techniques. Nonunion rates ranged from 0.0% to 33.3%. Screw arthrodesis demonstrated a lower nonunion rate than wire fusion (3.0% and 8.5% respectively; P = .01). Complication rates ranged from 0.0% to 22.1%. Aside from nonunions, there were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between arthrodesis techniques. The available PIPJ arthrodesis techniques have similar fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate outcomes. The existing data have significant limitations, and further research would be beneficial to elucidate any differences between techniques.

Topics & Concepts

NonunionArthrodesisMedicineSurgeryInterphalangeal JointArthropathyOrthopedic surgeryOsteoarthritisPathologyAlternative medicineOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFoot and Ankle SurgerySpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Techniques: A Systematic Review | Litcius