Litcius/Paper detail

SIX MONTHS PRIMARY SUCCESS RATE FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT BETWEEN VITRECTOMY AND SCLERAL BUCKLING

Takashi Koto, Ryo Kawasaki, Keita Yamakiri, Takayuki Baba, Koichi Nishitsuka, Akito Hirakata, Taiji Sakamoto, on behalf of the Japan-Retinal Detachment Registry Group

2020Retina22 citationsDOI

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes between pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB), and PPV+SB for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the Japan-RD Registry. METHODS: This is a nation-wide, multicenter, observational study based on the registry data between 2016 and 2017. The failure levels were defined as Level 1 (a failure of retinal detachment repair), Level 2 (remaining silicone oil), and Level 3 (multiple surgeries to achieve reattachment). We compared cases treated by SB or PPV in the subgroup of simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 2,775 cases were included. Overall, 6 months any levels of failure in total, SB, PPV, and PPV+SB were 9.2% (n = 256), 6.9% (n = 48), 8.2% (n = 157), and 21.3% (n = 51), respectively. Poor visual acuity at baseline in SB and inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and larger retinal tear in PPV were associated with a higher risk of failure. Pars plana vitrectomy was associated with a higher chance of achieving primary success in cases with simple RRD, especially for cases with superior RRD (adjusted hazard ratio 3.61, 95% confidence interval 2.22-5.94, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, surgical anatomic outcomes were equally successful in either SB or PPV. There were different baseline characteristics associated with primary success between SB and PPV.

Topics & Concepts

VitrectomyRetinal detachmentPars planaMedicineOphthalmologyHazard ratioConfidence intervalVisual acuityScleral bucklingRetinalSurgeryInternal medicineRetinal and Macular SurgeryIntraocular Surgery and LensesCorneal Surgery and Treatments