Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale
Ivan Paz‐Vinas, Evelyn L. Jensen, Laura D. Bertola, Martin F. Breed, Brian K. Hand, Margaret E. Hunter, Francine Kershaw, Deborah M. Leigh, Gordon Luikart, Joachim Mergeay, Joshua M. Miller, Charles B. van Rees, Gernot Segelbacher, Sean Hoban
Abstract
Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55-67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.
Topics & Concepts
EcologyBiologyScale (ratio)Genetic diversityEvolutionary biologyConservation geneticsMitochondrial DNABiodiversityGeographyGeneticsMicrosatelliteDemographyCartographyPopulationSociologyGeneAlleleGenetic diversity and population structureEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change