Litcius/Paper detail

Whitening efficacy and tooth sensitivity in a combined in‐office and at‐home whitening protocol: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Toshiki Takamizawa, Ryota AOKI, Makoto Saegusa, Eizo Hirokane, Mone Shoji, Munenori Yokoyama, Atsushi Kamimoto, Masashi Miyazaki

2023Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry15 citationsDOI

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This controlled randomized clinical trial determined the whitening efficacy and the intensity and absolute risk of tooth sensitivity in dual whitening when prefilled at-home whitening trays were used between in-office whitening intervals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in-office whitening agent containing 35% hydrogen peroxide was used. A prefilled tray with a whitening agent containing 6% hydrogen peroxide was used for at-home whitening. Sixty-six subjects were randomly assigned to three groups. Group I: at-home whitening was performed 10 times between the in-office whitening treatments. Group II: at-home whitening was performed five times between the in-office whitening treatments. Group III: only in-office whitening was performed. The tooth color changes were evaluated using a spectrophotometer. A visual analog scale was used to express the pain intensity. RESULTS: than group III. Tooth sensitivity showed higher values up to 24 h after whitening. CONCLUSIONS: Although dual whitening with the prefilled tray and in-office whitening had higher whitening ability than in-office whitening alone, the intensity and absolute risk of tooth sensitivity was similar. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The dual whitening might produce faster and stronger whitening effects than in-office whitening alone.

Topics & Concepts

Tooth whiteningMedicineCarbamide peroxideTooth SensitivityDentistryEnamel paintDental Erosion and TreatmentEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Whitening efficacy and tooth sensitivity in a combined in‐office and at‐home whitening protocol: A randomized controlled clinical trial | Litcius