Litcius/Paper detail

Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.

Ismail Dergaa, Lilia Zakhama, Chedly Dziri, Helmi Ben Saad

2023PubMed18 citationsOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The integrity of the peer-review process (PRP) is paramount in academic publishing and serves as a critical filter for scholarly output. This mini-review centers on the introduction of comprehensive guidelines, presented in tables format, aimed at streamlining the interactions between authors and reviewers during the PRP. These guidelines, derived from an in-depth exploration of the PRP, offer structured and practical advice to ensure constructive, transparent, and effective communication, especially related to the use of artificial intelligence. While this mini-review discusses the strengths and challenges of the current PRP, its primary focus is on providing tangible recommendations to enhance the quality and efficiency of the PRP. By providing explicit guidelines and emphasizing the cooperative essence of peer review, this mini-review aims to improve the PRP, ensuring that it remains a robust mechanism for upholding the highest standards of research and knowledge dissemination in an evolving academic setting.

Topics & Concepts

Process (computing)ConstructiveComputer sciencePublishingQuality (philosophy)Engineering ethicsTechnical peer reviewFilter (signal processing)Peer reviewKnowledge managementPolitical scienceEngineeringPhilosophyOperating systemLawComputer visionEpistemologyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education