Litcius/Paper detail

Monodromic dark energy and DESI

Samuel Goldstein, Marco Celoria, Fabian Schmidt

2026Physical review. D/Physical review. D.7 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Recent baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Collaboration have renewed interest in dynamical dark energy models, particularly those that cross the “phantom divide” ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>w</a:mi> <a:mrow> <a:mi>DE</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msub> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:mn>1</a:mn> </a:math> ). We present leading observational constraints on , a physically motivated scalar field dark energy scenario capable of realizing rapid oscillations about the phantom divide. Using cosmic microwave background (CMB) information, DESI DR2 BAO measurements, and type Ia supernova observations, we constrain the amplitude, frequency, phase, and power-law index describing the monodromic k-essence scenario at the background level. We find that the monodromic dark energy scenario can fit these datasets with a <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msup> <c:mi>χ</c:mi> <c:mn>2</c:mn> </c:msup> </c:math> that is comparable to the phenomenological <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:msub> <e:mi>w</e:mi> <e:mn>0</e:mn> </e:msub> <e:mtext>−</e:mtext> <e:msub> <e:mi>w</e:mi> <e:mi>a</e:mi> </e:msub> </e:math> parametrization. While the CMB and BAO data alone are consistent with the standard <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi> <g:mi>CDM</g:mi> </g:math> model, the inclusion of DESY5 supernovae shows a preference for a nonzero amplitude, <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <j:mi>A</j:mi> <j:mo>=</j:mo> <j:mn>0.4</j:mn> <j:msubsup> <j:mn>4</j:mn> <j:mrow> <j:mo>−</j:mo> <j:mn>0.12</j:mn> </j:mrow> <j:mrow> <j:mo>+</j:mo> <j:mn>0.16</j:mn> </j:mrow> </j:msubsup> </j:math> (fully marginalized 68% CL). Conversely, inclusion of the Pantheon-Plus supernovae provides no evidence for monodromic k-essence, with <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <l:mi>A</l:mi> <l:mo>&lt;</l:mo> <l:mn>0.43</l:mn> </l:math> (95% CL). We show that constraints on both monodromic dark energy and <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:msub> <n:mi>w</n:mi> <n:mn>0</n:mn> </n:msub> <n:mtext>−</n:mtext> <n:msub> <n:mi>w</n:mi> <n:mi>a</n:mi> </n:msub> </n:math> models are sensitive to the DESI DR2 LRG2 BAO distance, especially in the absence of supernova data.

Topics & Concepts

Dark energyPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundBaryon acoustic oscillationsSupernovaScalar field dark matterAstrophysicsDark matterOscillation (cell signaling)Cosmic background radiationScalar fieldEnergy (signal processing)Observational cosmologyDark fluidAstronomyField (mathematics)Lambda-CDM modelPhysics beyond the Standard ModelCOSMIC cancer databaseCosmologyParticle physicsHot dark matterCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena