Coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for severely calcified stenosis: Results from the ROTA.shock trial
Florian Blachutzik, Swetlana Meier, Melissa Weissner, Sophia Schlattner, Tommaso Gori, Helen Ullrich, Luise Gaede, Stephan Achenbach, Helge Möllmann, Bogdan Chitic, Adem Aksoy, Georg Nickenig, Maren Weferling, Jörn Pons‐Kühnemann, Oliver Dörr, Niklas Boeder, Malte Bayer, Albrecht Elsässer, Christian W. Hamm, Holger Nef, the ROTA.shock Investigators
Abstract
Abstract Background Severely calcified coronary lesions present a particular challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. Aims The aim of this randomized study was to determine whether coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is non‐inferior to rotational atherectomy (RA) regarding minimal stent area (MSA). Methods The randomized, prospective non‐inferiority ROTA.shock trial enrolled 70 patients between July 2019 and November 2021. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to undergo either IVL or RA before percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified coronary lesions. Optical coherence tomography was performed at the end of the procedure for primary endpoint analysis. Results The primary endpoint MSA was lower but non‐inferior after IVL (mean: 6.10 mm 2 , 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 5.32–6.87 mm 2 ) versus RA (6.60 mm 2 , 95% CI: 5.66–7.54 mm 2 ; difference in MSA: −0.50 mm 2 , 95% CI: −1.52–0.52 mm 2 ; non‐inferiority margin: −1.60 mm 2 ). Stent expansion was similar (RA: 0.83 ± 0.10 vs. IVL: 0.82 ± 0.11; p = 0.79). There were no significant differences regarding contrast media consumption (RA: 183.1 ± 68.8 vs. IVL: 163.3 ± 55.0 mL; p = 0.47), radiation dose (RA: 7269 ± 11288 vs. IVL: 5010 ± 4140 cGy cm 2 ; p = 0.68), and procedure time (RA: 79.5 ± 34.5 vs. IVL: 66.0 ± 19.4 min; p = 0.18). Conclusion IVL is non‐inferior regarding MSA and results in a similar stent expansion in a random comparison with RA. Procedure time, contrast volume, and dose‐area product do not differ significantly.