Litcius/Paper detail

Routine Functional Testing or Standard Care in High-Risk Patients after PCI

Duk‐Woo Park, Do‐Yoon Kang, Jung‐Min Ahn, Sung‐Cheol Yun, Yong‐Hoon Yoon, Seung‐Ho Hur, Cheol Hyun Lee, Won‐Jang Kim, Se Hun Kang, Chul Soo Park, Bong‐Ki Lee, Jung‐Won Suh, Junghan Yoon, Jae Woong Choi, Kee‐Sik Kim, Si Wan Choi, Su Nam Lee, Seung‐Jung Park

2022New England Journal of Medicine80 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data from randomized trials to guide a specific follow-up surveillance approach after myocardial revascularization. Whether a follow-up strategy that includes routine functional testing improves clinical outcomes among high-risk patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1706 patients with high-risk anatomical or clinical characteristics who had undergone PCI to a follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, exercise electrocardiography, or stress echocardiography) at 1 year after PCI or to standard care alone. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. Key secondary outcomes included invasive coronary angiography and repeat revascularization. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.7 years, 21.0% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had diffuse long lesions, 38.7% had diabetes, and 96.4% had been treated with drug-eluting stents. At 2 years, a primary-outcome event had occurred in 46 of 849 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 5.5%) in the functional-testing group and in 51 of 857 (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.0%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.35; P = 0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, 12.3% of the patients in the functional-testing group and 9.3% in the standard-care group had undergone invasive coronary angiography (difference, 2.99 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.01 to 5.99), and 8.1% and 5.8% of patients, respectively, had undergone repeat revascularization (difference, 2.23 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.22 to 4.68). CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk patients who had undergone PCI, a follow-up strategy of routine functional testing, as compared with standard care alone, did not improve clinical outcomes at 2 years. (Funded by the CardioVascular Research Foundation and Daewoong Pharmaceutical; POST-PCI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03217877.).

Topics & Concepts

Conventional PCIMedicineFunctional testingIntensive care medicineMEDLINEInternal medicineBiologyMyocardial infarctionBiochemistryCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Routine Functional Testing or Standard Care in High-Risk Patients after PCI | Litcius