Litcius/Paper detail

Piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis during pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis

Kumar Jayant, Isabella Reccia, Adriano Carneiro da Costa, Mauro Podda, Francesco Virdis, Nikolaos Machairas, David Nasralla, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Kenneth K. Poon, Christopher J. Gannon, John J. Fung, Nagy Habib, Omar H. Llaguna

2024BJS Open9 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with an increased incidence of surgical-site infections, often leading to a significant rise in morbidity and mortality. This trend underlines the inadequacy of traditional antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. Hence, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of antimicrobial prophylaxis, comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with traditional antibiotics. METHODS: Upon registering in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023479100), a systematic search of various databases was conducted over the interval 2000-2023. This inclusive search encompassed a wide range of study types, including prospective and retrospective cohorts and RCTs. The subsequent data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: A total of eight studies involving 2382 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and received either piperacillin/tazobactam (1196 patients) or traditional antibiotics (1186 patients) as antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group had significantly reduced incidences of surgical-site infections (OR 0.43 (95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.62); P < 0.00001) and major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III) (OR 0.61 (95% c.i. 0.45 to 0.81); P = 0.0008). Subgroup analysis of surgical-site infections highlighted significantly reduced incidences of superficial surgical-site infections (OR 0.34 (95% c.i. 0.14 to 0.84); P = 0.02) and organ/space surgical-site infections (OR 0.47 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.78); P = 0.004) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. Further, the analysis demonstrated significantly lower incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C) (OR 0.67 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 0.83); P = 0.0003) and mortality (OR 0.51 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.91); P = 0.02) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. CONCLUSION: Piperacillin/tazobactam as antimicrobial prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of postoperative surgical-site infections, major surgical complications (complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C), and mortality, hence supporting the implementation of piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis in current practice.

Topics & Concepts

MedicinePiperacillin/tazobactamPiperacillinTazobactamMeta-analysisIncidence (geometry)Antibiotic prophylaxisAntibioticsSubgroup analysisSurgical site infectionSurgeryProspective cohort studyInternal medicineMicrobiologyBiologyGeneticsPhysicsPseudomonas aeruginosaOpticsBacteriaPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchSurgical site infection preventionColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis during pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis | Litcius