Litcius/Paper detail

Crowdsourcing as a tool in the clinical assessment of intelligibility in dysarthria: How to deal with excessive variation

Wolfram Ziegler, Katharina Lehner, Madleen Klonowski, Nadine Geißler, Franziska Ammer, Christina Kurfeß, Holger Grötzbach, A. Mandl, Felicitas Knorr, Katrin Strecker, Theresa Schölderle, Sina Matern, Christiane Weck, B.F. Gröne, Stefanie Brühl, Christiane Kirchner, Ingo Kleiter, Ursula Sühn, Joachim von Eichmann, Christina Möhrle, Pete Guy Spencer, Rüdiger Ilg, Doris Klintwort, Daniel Lubecki, Steffy Marinho, Katharina Hogrefe

2021Journal of Communication Disorders15 citationsDOI

Topics & Concepts

Intelligibility (philosophy)CrowdsourcingDysarthriaOutlierAudiologyPsychologyRobustness (evolution)StatisticsSample size determinationTraitComputer scienceSpeech recognitionMathematicsMedicineBiochemistryWorld Wide WebPhilosophyChemistryGeneProgramming languageEpistemologyVoice and Speech DisordersHearing Loss and RehabilitationPhonetics and Phonology Research
Crowdsourcing as a tool in the clinical assessment of intelligibility in dysarthria: How to deal with excessive variation | Litcius