Litcius/Paper detail

Cytotoxicity of polymers intended for the extrusion-based additive manufacturing of surgical guides

Felix Burkhardt, Benedikt C. Spies, Christian Wesemann, Carl G. Schirmeister, Erik H. Licht, Florian Beuer, Thorsten Steinberg, Stefano Pieralli

2022Scientific Reports30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Extrusion-based printing enables simplified and economic manufacturing of surgical guides for oral implant placement. Therefore, the cytotoxicity of a biocopolyester (BE) and a polypropylene (PP), intended for the fused filament fabrication of surgical guides was evaluated. For comparison, a medically certified resin based on methacrylic esters (ME) was printed by stereolithography (n = 18 each group). Human gingival keratinocytes (HGK) were exposed to eluates of the tested materials and an impedance measurement and a tetrazolium assay (MTT) were performed. Modulations in gene expression were analyzed by quantitative PCR. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey tests were applied. None of the materials exceeded the threshold for cytotoxicity (< 70% viability in MTT) according to ISO 10993-5:2009. The impedance-based cell indices for PP and BE, reflecting cell proliferation, showed little deviations from the control, while ME caused a reduction of up to 45% after 72 h. PCR analysis after 72 h revealed only marginal modulations caused by BE while PP induced a down-regulation of genes encoding for inflammation and apoptosis (p < 0.05). In contrast, the 72 h ME eluate caused an up-regulation of these genes (p < 0.01). All evaluated materials can be considered biocompatible in vitro for short-term application. However, long-term contact to ME might induce (pro-)apoptotic/(pro-)inflammatory responses in HGK.

Topics & Concepts

CytotoxicityMTT assayBiomedical engineeringViability assayChemistryMaterials scienceIn vitroMedicineBiochemistryAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesBone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical Research