Litcius/Paper detail

Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy versus tiotropium monotherapy in patients with COPD

Sandeep Bansal, Martin Anderson, Antonio Anzueto, Nicola J. Brown, Chris Compton, Thomas Corbridge, David Erb, Catherine Harvey, Morrys C. Kaisermann, Mitchell Kaye, David A. Lipson, Neil Martin, Chang‐Qing Zhu, Alberto Papi

2021npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine40 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines do not currently include recommendations for escalation directly from monotherapy to triple therapy. This 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy study randomized 800 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients receiving tiotropium (TIO) for ≥3 months to once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 mcg via ELLIPTA ( n = 400) or TIO 18 mcg via HandiHaler ( n = 400) plus matched placebo. Study endpoints included change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) at Days 85 (primary), 28 and 84 (secondary), health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD Assessment Test [CAT]) and safety. FF/UMEC/VI significantly improved trough FEV 1 at all timepoints (Day 85 treatment difference [95% CI] 95 mL [62–128]; P < 0.001), and significantly improved SGRQ and CAT versus TIO. Treatment safety profiles were similar. Once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI significantly improved lung function and health status versus once-daily TIO in symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients, with a similar safety profile.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineFluticasone propionateCOPDDry-powder inhalerTiotropium bromideInhalerInternal medicinePlaceboAnesthesiaCorticosteroidAsthmaLung functionLungAlternative medicinePathologyChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery