Litcius/Paper detail

A prospective comparison of two computer aided detection systems with different false positive rates in colonoscopy

Goh Eun Chung, Jooyoung Lee, Seon Hee Lim, Hae Yeon Kang, Jung Oh Kim, Ji Hyun Song, Sun Young Yang, Ji Min Choi, Ji Yeon Seo, Jung Ho Bae

2024npj Digital Medicine18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of differing false positive (FP) rates in two computer-aided detection (CADe) systems on the clinical effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy. The primary outcomes were adenoma detection rate (ADR) and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). The ADR in the control, system A (3.2% FP rate), and system B (0.6% FP rate) groups were 44.3%, 43.4%, and 50.4%, respectively, with system B showing a significantly higher ADR than the control group. The APC for the control, A, and B groups were 0.75, 0.83, and 0.90, respectively, with system B also showing a higher APC than the control. The non-true lesion resection rates were 23.8%, 29.2%, and 21.3%, with system B having the lowest. The system with lower FP rates demonstrated improved ADR and APC without increasing the resection of non-neoplastic lesions. These findings suggest that higher FP rates negatively affect the clinical performance of AI-assisted colonoscopy.

Topics & Concepts

ColonoscopyAdenomaMedicineResectionGastroenterologyInternal medicineLesionSurgeryColorectal cancerCancerColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentAI in cancer detection