Litcius/Paper detail

Hypervolume-Optimal <i>μ</i>-Distributions on Line/Plane-Based Pareto Fronts in Three Dimensions

Ke Shang, Hisao Ishibuchi, Weiyu Chen, Yang Nan, Weiduo Liao

2021IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Hypervolume is widely used in the evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) field to evaluate the quality of a solution set. For a solution set with <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> solutions on a Pareto front, a larger hypervolume means a better solution set. Investigating the distribution of the solution set with the largest hypervolume is an important topic in EMO, which is the so-called hypervolume-optimal <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> -distribution. Theoretical results have shown that the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> solutions are uniformly distributed on a linear Pareto front in two dimensions. However, the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> solutions are not always uniformly distributed on a single-line Pareto front in three dimensions. They are only uniform when the single-line Pareto front has one constant objective. In this article, we further investigate the hypervolume-optimal <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> -distribution in three dimensions. We consider the line-based and plane-based Pareto fronts. For the line-based Pareto fronts, we extend the single-line Pareto front to two-line and three-line Pareto fronts, where each line has one constant objective. For the plane-based Pareto fronts, the linear triangular and inverted triangular Pareto fronts are considered. First, we show that the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula> solutions are not always uniformly distributed on the line-based Pareto fronts. The uniformity depends on how the lines are combined. Then, we show that a uniform solution set on the plane-based Pareto front is not always optimal for hypervolume maximization. It is locally optimal with respect to a <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$(\mu +1)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> selection scheme. Our results can help researchers in the community to better understand and utilize the hypervolume indicator.

Topics & Concepts

Pareto principleMulti-objective optimizationPareto interpolationMathematical optimizationConstant (computer programming)MathematicsSet (abstract data type)Solution setLomax distributionPareto distributionPareto analysisOptimization problemApplied mathematicsLine (geometry)Evolutionary algorithmDistribution (mathematics)Computer sciencePareto optimalFront (military)Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization AlgorithmsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications