Litcius/Paper detail

What to Choose for Estimating Leaf Water Status—Spectral Reflectance or In vivo Chlorophyll Fluorescence?

Martina Špundová, Zuzana Kučerová, Vladimíra Nožková, Monika Opatíková, Lucie Procházková, Pavel Klimeš, Jan Nauš

2024Plant Phenomics9 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

L. cv. Bojos) leaves as a model case, we measured parameters of spectral R and chlorophyll fluorescence and then evaluated and compared their applicability by means of introduced coefficients (coefficient of reliability, sensitivity, and inaccuracy). This comparison showed that, in our case, chlorophyll fluorescence was more reliable and universal than spectral R. Nevertheless, it is most appropriate to use both methods simultaneously, as the specific ranking of their parameters according to the coefficient of reliability may indicate a specific scenario of changes in desiccating leaves.

Topics & Concepts

ReflectivityFluorescenceChlorophyll fluorescenceRemote sensingChlorophyllIn vivoEnvironmental scienceChlorophyll aSpectral propertiesBotanyChemistryBiologyOpticsGeographyPhysicsBiotechnologyComputational chemistryLeaf Properties and Growth MeasurementRemote Sensing in AgricultureSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses