Litcius/Paper detail

Normative values and reference equation for the six-minute step test to evaluate functional exercise capacity: a multicenter study

Vanessa Salles Albuquerque, Simone Dal Corso, Daniel Pereira do Amaral, Túlio Medina Dutra de Oliveira, Gérson F. de Souza, Rachel Naara Silva de Souza, Ana Karolyn Menezes Nogueira Nogueira, Pedro Dal Lago, Maria Luísa Rocha Dadalt, Isadora Faraco Corrêa, Graziella França Bernardelli Cipriano, Fabiola Maria Ferreira da Silva, Raquel Rodrigues Britto, Anderson José, Carla Malaguti

2022Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia14 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Objective: To establish normative values and a reference equation for the number of steps climbed during the six-minute step test (6MST) in healthy adults, and to assess the reliability of the test and of the equation. Methods: This was a multicenter cross-sectional study involving 468 healthy volunteers (age range: 18-79 years) recruited from the general community in six research laboratories across different regions of Brazil, which is a country with continental dimensions. The 6MST was performed twice (30-min interval), and clinical, demographic, and functional variables were evaluated. An independent sample of 24 volunteers was evaluated to test the reference equation a posteriori. Results: The number of steps had excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96 [95%CI: 0.95-0.97]), and the mean number of steps was 175 ± 45, the number being 14% greater in males than in females. The best performance on the test was correlated with age (r = -0.60), sex (r = 0.28), weight (r = 0.13), height (r = 0.41), BMI (r = -0.22), waist circumference (r = -0.22), thigh circumference (r = 0.15), FVC (r = 0.54), and physical activity level (r = 0.17; p < 0.05 for all). In the regression analysis, age, sex, height, and weight explained 42% of the variability of the 6MST. Normative values were established for the 6MST according to age and sex. There was no difference between the 6MST values from the independent sample and its predicted values (157 ± 29 steps vs. 161 ± 25 steps; p = 0.47; 97% of predicted values). Conclusions: The normative values and the reference equation for the 6MST in this study seem adequate to accurately predict the physical functional performance in adults in Brazil.

Topics & Concepts

Intraclass correlationMedicineWaistNormativeCircumferenceCross-sectional studyReference valuesBody mass indexDemographyRegression analysisPhysical therapyStatisticsGerontologyInternal medicineMathematicsPsychometricsClinical psychologyGeometryPathologyPhilosophySociologyEpistemologyPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyBody Composition Measurement Techniques