Primary implant stability based on alternative site preparation techniques: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Xinbo Yu, Cheng Chang, Wennan Guo, Yiqun Wu, Wenjie Zhou, Dedong Yu
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effect of special implant site preparation methods in improving primary implant stability in low-density bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This meta-analysis included studies published in English and Mandarin Chinese up to March 31, 2022 from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Wanfang databases. The primary stability of five site preparation methods were measured using implant stability quotient. The random-effects model was chosen for data analysis. Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation assessment was adopted as a collective grading of the overall body of evidence. RESULTS: 12 of the 17 studies included in the meta-analysis were randomized control trials. Three studies investigated osseodensification drilling (OD), eight studies examined osteotome technique (OT), five studies explored piezosurgery (PS), and four studies were conducted on under-drilling (UD). Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant increase in primary stability for the OD (mean difference [MD], 10.25; 95% CI: 4.97-15.52; p < 0.001), OT (MD, 6.34; 95% CI: 2.26-10.42; p = 0.002), and UD (MD, 11.43; 95% CI: 5.17-17.68; p < 0.001) groups when compared to the conventional drilling group, while the PS group did not (MD, 1.50; 95% CI: -2.54-5.54; p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Significantly higher primary implant stability was shown in the OD, UD, and OT groups compared to the conventional drilling group. PS displayed the least favorable primary stability and when compared to conventional drilling, was not statistically significant.