Comparison of TGSE-BLADE DWI, RESOLVE DWI, and SS-EPI DWI in healthy volunteers and patients after cerebral aneurysm clipping
Sachi Okuchi, Yasutaka Fushimi, Kazumichi Yoshida, Satoshi Nakajima, Akihiko Sakata, Takuya Hinoda, Sayo Otani, Hajime Sagawa, Kun Zhou, Yukihiro Yamao, Masakazu Okawa, Yuji Nakamoto
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is prone to have susceptibility artifacts in an inhomogeneous magnetic field. We compared distortion and artifacts among three diffusion acquisition techniques (single-shot echo-planar imaging [SS-EPI DWI], readout-segmented EPI [RESOLVE DWI], and 2D turbo gradient- and spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging with non-Cartesian BLADE trajectory [TGSE-BLADE DWI]) in healthy volunteers and in patients with a cerebral aneurysm clip. Seventeen healthy volunteers and 20 patients who had undergone surgical cerebral aneurysm clipping were prospectively enrolled. SS-EPI DWI, RESOLVE DWI, and TGSE-BLADE DWI of the brain were performed using 3 T scanners. Distortion was the least in TGSE-BLADE DWI, and lower in RESOLVE DWI than SS-EPI DWI near air-bone interfaces in healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). Length of clip-induced artifact and distortion near the metal clip were the least in TGSE-BLADE DWI, and lower in RESOLVE DWI than SS-EPI DWI (P < 0.01). Image quality scores for geometric distortion, susceptibility artifacts, and overall image quality in both healthy volunteers and patients were the best in TGSE-BLADE DWI, and better in RESOLVE DWI than SS-EPI DWI (P < 0.001). Among the three DWI sequences, image quality was the best in TGSE-BLADE DWI in terms of distortion and artifacts, in both healthy volunteers and patients with an aneurysm clip.