Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of Metal Adhesion Layers for Au Films in Thermoplasmonic Applications

William M. Abbott, Christopher P. Murray, Sorcha Ní Lochlainn, Frank Bello, Chuan‐Jian Zhong, Christopher M. Smith, Eoin K. McCarthy, Clive Downing, Dermot Daly, A. K. Petford‐Long, Cormac McGuinness, Igor Chunin, John F. Donegan, David McCloskey

2020ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces21 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

If thermoplasmonic applications such as heat-assisted magnetic recording are to be commercially viable, it is necessary to optimize both thermal stability and plasmonic performance of the devices involved. In this work, a variety of different adhesion layers were investigated for their ability to reduce dewetting of sputtered 50 nm Au films on SiO2 substrates. Traditional adhesion layer metals Ti and Cr were compared with alternative materials of Al, Ta, and W. Film dewetting was shown to increase when the adhesion material diffuses through the Au layer. An adhesion layer thickness of 0.5 nm resulted in superior thermomechanical stability for all adhesion metals, with an enhancement factor of up to 200× over 5 nm thick analogues. The metals were ranked by their effectiveness in inhibiting dewetting, starting with the most effective, in the order Ta > Ti > W > Cr > Al. Finally, the Au surface-plasmon polariton response was compared for each adhesion layer, and it was found that 0.5 nm adhesion layers produced the best response, with W being the optimal adhesion layer material for plasmonic performance.

Topics & Concepts

DewettingMaterials scienceAdhesionLayer (electronics)Thermal stabilityPlasmonNanotechnologyMetalComposite materialOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringThin filmMetallurgyEngineeringFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchOptical Coatings and Gratings
Comparison of Metal Adhesion Layers for Au Films in Thermoplasmonic Applications | Litcius