Clinical comparison of 27-gauge and 23-gauge instruments on the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy surgery for the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases
Steve Charles, Allen C. Ho, Pravin U. Dugel, Chris D. Riemann, María H. Berrocal, Sunil Gupta, Cody Hamilton, Dina Joy K. Abulon
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To compare outcomes of 27-gauge and 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for treatment of vitreoretinal diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Sixty-eight patients undergoing microincisional PPV for treatment of vitreoretinal diseases were randomized 1 : 1 to 27-gauge or 23-gauge surgery with a 7500 cuts-per-minute vitrectomy probe. The most common reasons for vitrectomy were epiretinal membrane (49%) and vitreous hemorrhage (24%). Mean ± standard deviation (SD) changes from immediate preoperative to immediate postoperative intraocular pressure were -0.40 ± 6.60 mmHg in the 27-gauge and -3.05 ± 7.64 mmHg in the 23-gauge group (adjusted mean difference 2.42 mmHg, 95% lower confidence limit 0.64, P = 0.013), but these changes were not associated with primary reason for vitrectomy (P = 0.065). Mean ± SD conjunctival edema grades in the 27-gauge and 23-gauge groups 1 week after surgery were 0.02 ± 0.124 and 0.10 ± 0.246, respectively (least squares mean difference -0.09, 95% upper confidence limit -0.03, P = 0.004), and were 0.01 ± 0.122 and 0.12 ± 0.338, respectively, at the probe incision site. Conjunctival edema grades were similar in both groups at 1 and 3 months. Mean ± SD pain ratings on postoperative day 1 - an indicator of patient comfort - were similar in the two groups. SUMMARY: Smaller diameter vitrectomy instruments are associated with smaller reductions in immediate postoperative intraocular pressure.