Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials

Fariha Naz, Abdul Samad Khan, Mohammed Abdul Kader, Lamis Omar Saad Al Gelban, Nada Mohammed Ali Mousa, Raghad Asiri, Abbas Saeed Hakeem

2020The Saudi Dental Journal57 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite. METHODOLOGY: Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite. CONCLUSION: The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.

Topics & Concepts

Materials scienceGlass ionomer cementScanning electron microscopeComposite materialSurface roughnessSurface finishComposite numberRestorative dentistryCementSignificant differenceAtomic force microscopyBond strengthDentistryAdhesiveMathematicsNanotechnologyMedicineLayer (electronics)StatisticsDental materials and restorationsDental Erosion and TreatmentDental Health and Care Utilization
Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials | Litcius