Litcius/Paper detail

Residual stress and microhardness evolution induced by conventional and ultrasonic shot peening

Qi Zhang, Shuo Xu, Ziqian Zhang, Xianjie Zhang, Junbiao Wang, Chaorun Si

2022Materials Science and Technology25 citationsDOI

Abstract

Very limited comparative research has been conducted on microstructure evolution induced by different peening methods. Herein, the 2024T351 aluminium alloy was subjected to conventional shot peening (CSP) and ultrasonic shot peening (USP) under the identical Almen height to investigate the differences in surface roughness, residual stress and microhardness. The results demonstrated that under the same Almen height, the CSP treatment resulted in a rougher surface with higher surface roughness and more surface defects, and higher surface and maximum compressive residual stress (CRS) than the USP treatment. In contrast, the CRS depth was relatively lower for the CSP treated samples. In addition, the USP treatment produced more significant microhardness and hardened layer than the CSP treatment.

Topics & Concepts

Materials scienceShot peeningIndentation hardnessResidual stressPeeningSurface roughnessMetallurgyMicrostructureAluminiumSurface layerComposite materialSurface finishLaser peeningUltrasonic sensorAluminium alloyLayer (electronics)AcousticsPhysicsSurface Treatment and Residual StressErosion and Abrasive MachiningHigh-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior