Litcius/Paper detail

Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain in Children

Laura Olejnik, João Pedro Lima, Behnam Sadeghirad, Jason W. Busse, Iván D. Flórez, Samina Ali, James Bunker, Danny Jomaa, Adam Bleik, Mohamed Eltorki

2025JAMA Pediatrics20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Importance: Several pharmacologic options exist for the management of acute pediatric pain; however, their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the relative benefits and harms of pharmacotherapy for acute pediatric pain through a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Data Sources: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus to October 2023. Study Selection: Trials that enrolled children (aged <18 years) with acute pain and randomized them to receive a pharmacologic analgesic vs an alternate analgesic or placebo were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Pairs of reviewers independently reviewed abstracts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of eligible trials. A frequentist random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses, and the certainty of evidence was assessed for treatment effects using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Main Outcomes: The primary outcomes were pain severity (range, 0-10 cm using a visual analog scale; minimally important difference [MID], 1 cm), need for rescue medication, symptom relief, and adverse drug events. Results: A total of 41 trials involving 4935 children were included. High- to moderate-certainty evidence found that compared with placebo, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (weighted mean difference [WMD], -1.29; 95% CI, -1.89 to -0.70; modeled risk difference [RD] for achieving the MID, 16%), ketamine (WMD, -1.12; 95% CI, -2.09 to -0.14; modeled RD for achieving the MID, 14%), and mid-high potency opioids (WMD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.83 to -0.55; modeled RD for achieving the MID, 15%) reduced pain. Only NSAIDs reduced the need for rescue medication (relative risk [RR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.68; modeled RD, 16% fewer patients). Neither NSAIDs (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.55) nor acetaminophen (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.87) increased the risk of short-term gastrointestinal adverse events. All other comparisons showed moderate-certainty evidence of little to no difference from placebo or were supported by low/very low-certainty evidence. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with placebo, NSAIDs, ketamine, and mid- to high-potency opioids are effective in reducing acute pediatric pain. NSAIDs provide the greatest benefits and least harm, suggesting that they should be the first-line therapy for acute painful conditions in children.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineAnalgesicMEDLINEMeta-analysisPlaceboRandomized controlled trialRelative riskAdverse effectVisual analogue scaleCINAHLData extractionClinical trialConfidence intervalIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyAnesthesiaInternal medicinePsychological interventionAlternative medicinePsychiatryPolitical sciencePathologyLawPediatric Pain Management TechniquesIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersChild Abuse and Related Trauma
Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain in Children | Litcius