Litcius/Paper detail

Characteristics of Low‐Energy Phases of Hafnia and Zirconia from Density Functional Theory Calculations

Luis Azevedo Antunes, Richard Ganser, Christopher Kuenneth, Alfred Kersch

2022physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

A systematic simulation study of low‐energy phases of HfO 2 and ZrO 2 , including 24‐atomic cells derived from 180° interphases, leads to a new monoclinic Pc phase (mIII) with a monoclinic angle and a polarization of 0.3 C m −2 . This opens up a new transition path toward the monoclinic P2 1 /c phase ( m ) starting from the tetragonal P4 2 /nmc phase ( t ), with comparable lower‐energy barriers, where the high‐symmetric phases show the largest temperature dependence. The tetragonal P4 2 /nmc phase, the cubic ( c ) phase, and the less investigated cubic (cII) phase are favored.

Topics & Concepts

Monoclinic crystal systemTetragonal crystal systemHafniaPhase (matter)Materials scienceCrystallographyCubic zirconiaDensity functional theoryPhase transitionCondensed matter physicsChemistryCrystal structureComputational chemistryPhysicsMetallurgyOrganic chemistryCeramicFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance DevicesSemiconductor materials and devicesMXene and MAX Phase Materials
Characteristics of Low‐Energy Phases of Hafnia and Zirconia from Density Functional Theory Calculations | Litcius