Litcius/Paper detail

Locked And Tied: Locking Chain And Change Of Problems

Kartini, Alfiah Khoirunisa, Raihan Raihan

2021IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI)10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Blockchains are typically named as democratisation technologies, however ever, their relationship with the law and general democratic establishments remains uncertain. First, it compares blockchain technology with the broader theory of transparency. Second, it examines the link between transparency and democracy, and asks how blockchain technology mediates these relationships. Finally, it studies blockchain however technology affects specific manifestations of transparency and freedom of information. The conclusion of this text is that the relationship between transparency and democratic ideals is complex, controversial, and extremely contextual; the “democratized” technical transparency embedded within the blockchain will simply be evidenced in its application. It's undemocratic. while not considering the political gatekeepers and also the legal, social, and cultural desires that support these goals, blockchain technology cannot bring home the bacon the broader goals of transparency.

Topics & Concepts

Transparency (behavior)BlockchainDemocratizationDemocracyPoliticsFreedom of informationLaw and economicsDemocratic governancePolitical scienceInternet privacyBusinessSociologyPolitical economyComputer securityComputer scienceLawBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Locked And Tied: Locking Chain And Change Of Problems | Litcius