Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
Amir Kaywan Aftahy, Melanie Barz, Philipp Krauß, Arthur Wagner, Nicole Lange, Alaa Hijazi, Benedikt Wiestler, Bernhard Meyer, Chiara Negwer, Jens Gempt
Abstract
(1) Background: Midline meningiomas such as olfactory groove (OGMs), planum sphenoidale (PSMs), or tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are challenging, and determining the appropriate approach is important. We propose a decision algorithm for choosing suitable transcranial approaches. (2) Methods: A retrospective chart review between 06/2007 and 01/2020. Clinical outcomes, radiographic findings, and postoperative complication rates were analyzed with respect to operative approaches. (3) Results: We included 88 patients in the analysis. Of these, 18.2% (16/88) underwent an interhemispheric approach, 72.7% (64/88) underwent a pterional/frontolateral/supraorbital approach, 2.3% (2/88) underwent a unilateral subfrontal approach, and 6.8% (6/88) underwent a bifrontal approach. All OGMs underwent median approaches, along with one PSM. All of the other PSMs and TSMs were resected via lateral approaches. The preoperative tumor volume was ∅20.2 ± 27.1 cm3. Median approaches had significantly higher tumor volume but also higher rates of Simpson I resection (75.0% vs. 34.4%). An improvement of visual deficits was observed in 34.1% (30/88). The adverse event rate was 17.0%. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range 0–112 months). (4) Conclusions: Median approaches provides satisfying results for OGMs, lateral approaches enable sufficient exposure of the visual apparatus for PSMs and TSMs. In proposing a simple decision-making algorithm, the authors found that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved for midline meningiomas.