MSFragger-Labile: A Flexible Method to Improve Labile PTM Analysis in Proteomics
Daniel A. Polasky, Daniel Geiszler, Fengchao Yu, Kai Li, Guo Ci Teo, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii
Abstract
•Many peptide modifications are labile, meaning they fragment during tandem MS.•Proteomics search engines often struggle to identify labile modifications.•MSFragger Labile incorporates modification fragmentation into search.•Labile searches can identify many more modified peptides than conventional searches. Posttranslational modifications of proteins play essential roles in defining and regulating the functions of the proteins they decorate, making identification of these modifications critical to understanding biology and disease. Methods for enriching and analyzing a wide variety of biological and chemical modifications of proteins have been developed using mass spectrometry–based proteomics, largely relying on traditional database search methods to identify the resulting mass spectra of modified peptides. These database search methods treat modifications as static attachments of a mass to particular position in the peptide sequence, but many modifications undergo fragmentation in tandem mass spectrometry experiments alongside, or instead of, the peptide backbone. While this fragmentation can confound traditional search methods, it also offers unique opportunities for improved searches that incorporate modification-specific fragment ions. Here, we present a new labile mode in the MSFragger search engine that provides the flexibility to tailor modification-centric searches to the fragmentation observed. We show that labile mode can dramatically improve spectrum identification rates of phosphopeptides, RNA-crosslinked peptides, and ADP-ribosylated peptides. Each of these modifications presents distinct fragmentation characteristics, showcasing the flexibility of MSFragger labile mode to improve search for a wide variety of biological and chemical modifications. Posttranslational modifications of proteins play essential roles in defining and regulating the functions of the proteins they decorate, making identification of these modifications critical to understanding biology and disease. Methods for enriching and analyzing a wide variety of biological and chemical modifications of proteins have been developed using mass spectrometry–based proteomics, largely relying on traditional database search methods to identify the resulting mass spectra of modified peptides. These database search methods treat modifications as static attachments of a mass to particular position in the peptide sequence, but many modifications undergo fragmentation in tandem mass spectrometry experiments alongside, or instead of, the peptide backbone. While this fragmentation can confound traditional search methods, it also offers unique opportunities for improved searches that incorporate modification-specific fragment ions. Here, we present a new labile mode in the MSFragger search engine that provides the flexibility to tailor modification-centric searches to the fragmentation observed. We show that labile mode can dramatically improve spectrum identification rates of phosphopeptides, RNA-crosslinked peptides, and ADP-ribosylated peptides. Each of these modifications presents distinct fragmentation characteristics, showcasing the flexibility of MSFragger labile mode to improve search for a wide variety of biological and chemical modifications. Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins play essential roles in defining and regulating protein functions (1Walsh C.T. Posttranslational Modification of Proteins: Expanding Nature’s Inventory.1st Ed. Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, CO2006Google Scholar). Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods have become the preferred method for large-scale identification of proteins from biological samples, becoming known as mass spectrometry (MS)–based proteomics (2Doll S. Burlingame A.L. Mass spectrometry-based detection and assignment of protein posttranslational modifications.ACS Chem. Biol. 2015; 10: 63-71Crossref PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar). The ability of MS to detect and characterize posttranslational and chemical modifications of proteins at whole-proteome scales is currently unmatched and provides crucial insights into the function and regulation of proteins in biological systems. Analysis of PTMs is typically accomplished by broadly similar MS methods as those used for unmodified peptide analysis in proteomics, often with an added enrichment step to concentrate modified peptides of interest prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. Database search methods to identify the resulting tandem mass spectra are also similar to those used for unmodified peptides, as indeed, chemical artifacts and common modifications are nearly always included in such standard proteomics searches. The predominant search strategy for modified peptides assumes that modifications will remain intact on the peptide, simply shifting the mass of the amino acid to which they are connected by a fixed value (3Eng J.K. McCormack A.L. Yates J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database.J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994; 5: 976-989Crossref PubMed Scopus (5569) Google Scholar). Fragment ions matching the combined amino acid and modification masses are used to detect modified peptides and localize the modification within the peptide. However, many modifications experience their own fragmentation during tandem MS, causing a mismatch between the expected and observed fragment ions. Some peptides can still be identified, by matching only ions that do not contain the modification site, but many spectra of modified peptides cannot be identified, contributing to the “dark matter” of proteomics (4Chick J.M. Kolippakkam D. Nusinow D.P. Zhai B. Rad R. Huttlin E.L. et al.A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides.Nat. Biotechnol. 2015; 33: 743-749Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar, 5Kong A.T. Leprevost F.V. Avtonomov D.M. Mellacheruvu D. Nesvizhskii A.I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.Nat. Met. 2017; 14: 513-520Crossref PubMed Scopus (678) Google Scholar). Labile modifications, or those that fragment instead of or in addition to peptide backbone fragmentation in tandem MS, are extremely common. The most abundant PTMs, phosphorylation (6Potel C.M. Lemeer S. Heck A.J.R. Phosphopeptide fragmentation and site localization by mass spectrometry: an update.Anal. Chem. 2019; 91: 126-141Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar, 7Brown R. Stuart S.S. Houel S. Ahn N.G. Old W.M. Large-scale examination of factors influencing phosphopeptide neutral loss during collision induced dissociation.J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015; 26: 1128-1142Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar, 8Everley R.A. Huttlin E.L. Erickson A.R. Beausoleil S.A. Gygi S.P. Neutral loss is a very common occurrence in phosphotyrosine-containing peptides labeled with isobaric tags.J. Proteome Res. 2017; 16: 1069-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar) and glycosylation, are labile, along with many less abundant PTMs like sulfation (9Nemeth-Cawley J.F. Karnik S. Rouse J.C. Analysis of sulfated peptides using positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.J. Mass Spectrom. 2001; 36: 1301-1311Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar) and R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google and many peptide modifications of chemical modifications used for methods et of Chem. PubMed Scopus Google and peptides a of a peptide RNA-crosslinked peptides S. PubMed Scopus Google and many many modifications of interest are labile, have been to identify and localize peptides labile modifications. methods like and typically The of in Chem. PubMed Scopus Google not always S. Burlingame A.L. fragmentation in and dissociation.J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google modifications intact they are labile in collision methods, database search methods to identify modified peptides R. Burlingame A.L. of protein using mass spectrometry on S. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, for peptide data analysis by of and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). However, these methods at the of The of in Chem. PubMed Scopus Google many to for searches. for modifications that are only labile, such as the most common analysis traditional search engines neutral from a such as loss of acid from peptides J.K. an database search PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Burlingame A.L. analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data from PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R.A. a peptide search engine into the Proteome Res. 10: PubMed Scopus Google which for improved search of modified peptides in but the flexibility to more modifications, such as for modification that is during fragmentation Burlingame A.L. analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data from PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the most search methods for PTMs common neutral or search methods to a particular as is common for search methods for new or less common modifications are not as the fragment ions to these modifications are not in common search search engines have been developed or to search modifications, for glycosylation, modification-specific fragment ions. These search engines and are extremely but are with a particular or of modifications, in the flexibility to new modifications or fragment ions to the an approach in the search method developed for for or peptide modifications (4Chick J.M. Kolippakkam D. Nusinow D.P. Zhai B. Rad R. Huttlin E.L. et al.A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides.Nat. Biotechnol. 2015; 33: 743-749Crossref PubMed Scopus (281) Google Scholar, 5Kong A.T. Leprevost F.V. Avtonomov D.M. Mellacheruvu D. Nesvizhskii A.I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.Nat. Met. 2017; 14: 513-520Crossref PubMed Scopus (678) Google Scholar). and the similar mass or searches modification with Proteome Res. PubMed Scopus Google of peptides with a or a between the peptide mass and the observed mass from peptides with or known modifications to be for labile modifications, the peptide is often modifications in these methods, as a are to improve the of such searches. this the of the search for modifications, a search method in MSFragger to for fragment ions intact modification A.T. Avtonomov D.M. et of modified peptides using PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). However, the search is a for labile modifications that are from the peptide during as for peptide fragment ions the modification is the method in these The MSFragger search method of this for dramatically by for peptide backbone fragment ions glycosylation, or with a Nesvizhskii A.I. and comprehensive and analysis with Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). search engines that searches incorporate or of these as such as peptide and protein identification PubMed Scopus Google Burlingame A.L. analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data from PubMed Scopus Google and modification with Proteome Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). many modifications are not a of the or a of the peptide with such as the loss of from and during neutral loss of Modification loss can also or fragment ions in the mass spectrum that the of a particular modification R. Stuart S.S. Houel S. Ahn N.G. Old W.M. Large-scale examination of factors influencing phosphopeptide neutral loss during collision induced dissociation.J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015; 26: 1128-1142Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar, 8Everley R.A. Huttlin E.L. Erickson A.R. Beausoleil S.A. Gygi S.P. Neutral loss is a very common occurrence in phosphotyrosine-containing peptides labeled with isobaric tags.J. Proteome Res. 2017; 16: 1069-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar, R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Nesvizhskii A.I. for detection in spectra of modified Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. D. et of in the Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.A. mass spectrometry of ADP-ribosylated Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, D. S.S. Neutral loss of acid in peptide a for mass identification of protein Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). a wide of labile modification we have new in to as Labile mode searches of spectra for ions a labile as as peptide or fragment masses resulting from modification fragmentation to improve spectrum identification and While are search engines that or of these for modifications, MSFragger Labile offers these for modification by making the fragment ions a of and Here, we the of labile mode searches to the spectral assignment for and We used in to the fragment ions to in labile to be for modifications fragmentation Nesvizhskii A.I. for detection in spectra of modified Scopus Google Scholar). Labile search been into MSFragger with and and for the labile phosphorylation and searches are from the in data from from the of et S. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). by and and by LC-MS/MS on an using at collision to the Analysis data from the from the data mass from and samples, and on an mass using at et of 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). data from and to the of et from at collision and on an mass B. analysis of in 2017; Scopus Google Scholar). data from in which ADP-ribosylated peptides using from with and on an modified with a for experiments J.M. B. et using PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). data from ADP-ribosylated peptides from and using and by on an at R. S. et identification of the of and Scopus Google Scholar). to and using from D. R. D. for proteomics PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, B. R. D. S. et al.A for mass spectrometry and proteomics.Nat. Biotechnol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). searches using and searches used mass protein for and neutral loss are for of labile search searches labile modifications from mass searches to the MSFragger in the as modifications from conventional MSFragger searches using the mass as a and used as in conventional searches. searches and searches with many modifications, labile modifications can instead be as mass as by and the mass in Nesvizhskii A.I. R. to the of peptide by and database Chem. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) can be used to for mass as is in MSFragger searches Nesvizhskii A.I. and comprehensive and analysis with Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) or can be used in is for searches from MSFragger of a mass in is still as the mass provides more of mass labile or can be localization of modifications, D. et and mass modification localization for the Proteome Res. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) is in in addition to the fragment localization of MSFragger and can be used instead of or in addition to MSFragger searches used A.I. R. for proteins by tandem mass Chem. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) for protein and to peptide, and protein in using the method Leprevost Avtonomov D.M. Mellacheruvu D. et a for shotgun proteomics data Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). data a with and common added in with MSFragger search using and and fragment of and mass fixed and modifications of and protein as the intact and the only as fragmentation of by et and which we using the Nesvizhskii A.I. for detection in spectra of modified Scopus Google Scholar). labile and as mass on amino with labile mode or peptide and with or a fragment of the conventional modifications of and on amino a of conventional searches only on amino and and only on the most modified as but RNA-crosslinked peptides than the conventional search used for with search The data the database as used in the MSFragger search with search and fragment of and mass fixed modifications of and of and peptide and modifications of and of modifications peptide to phosphorylation on or on a peptide, as modifications mass with the of and labile always to labile a fragment of to neutral loss of acid but or peptide ions. that is intact during or loss of than acid R.A. Huttlin E.L. Erickson A.R. Beausoleil S.A. Gygi S.P. Neutral loss is a very common occurrence in phosphotyrosine-containing peptides labeled with isobaric tags.J. Proteome Res. 2017; 16: 1069-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google the fragment for acid loss to phosphorylation in However, is phosphopeptides, the enrichment the those this fragment not be Neutral loss of can on amino from resulting in for using this fragment The neutral loss in MSFragger for searches and can this as neutral loss that are less than the are prior to used for with search used for localization of modifications, using a static fragment a of and the mode data from et at S. S. D. et of in the Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics Met. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) the database as with MSFragger and for of data used the database as the and searches. of data used a with and common added in with MSFragger searches using with the of to the searches in the to using enrichment to mass Methods and Scopus Google Scholar) for data from et or for data from et and fragment and and fixed modification of and modifications of and protein of modifications peptide for conventional as a mass modification with a of peptide. the a of on a peptide as a mass and as a for to the on and for data from et and for data from et and and for data from et ions for searches and for and peptide ions and for labile and searches R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). fragment mass of for labile search of only to loss of the of the and ions for and from et R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). searches used peptide and ions searches used and ions. used for with and mass from improved for this experiments for this are from of peptide modifications undergo fragmentation in the expected mass of peptide backbone fragment ions and resulting in for search methods that do not these into The MSFragger labile search mode provides a approach to the ions resulting from modification fragmentation in spectra to be for ions and for or fragmentation of a modification with peptide and fragment ions. to many search engines with modification-specific only for modifications, MSFragger labile incorporates of as that can be to the of the labile search we data to PTMs, with a distinct fragmentation that is by the labile search An of the and methods included in labile mode is in MSFragger labile mode search is an of the MSFragger search A.T. Leprevost F.V. Avtonomov D.M. Mellacheruvu D. Nesvizhskii A.I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.Nat. Met. 2017; 14: 513-520Crossref PubMed Scopus (678) Google Scholar) and mass search for labile modifications and of to the of fragment ions by fragmentation of labile modifications or to a of the modification observed on own from a modified peptide, can be along with a ions spectra a modified peptide and are used as a for labile mode in which only spectra the of of the ions a are for the labile mass spectra not are only for peptides with mass unmodified or the intact peptide a can be ions are common for modifications labile such as the in labile these ions are added to the peptide a for modified peptides that to peptide backbone fragment ions that a of the Fragment ions are added to the peptide like peptide for modified peptides. peptide fragment ions are also used to localize the modification within the peptide sequence, only that the modification site can a modified fragment can also be to loss of of the amino acid at the modification site during loss of such as loss of acid from or MSFragger searches can be in the conventional in the new labile or in a mode the modifications that can be as a modification and as a mass will be a peptide the intact modification the modification and a peptide that or the modification the labile mass with the as the assignment for The search will also peptides a modification and a mass for a of modifications on the peptide. of modifications in labile or searches can be accomplished in of fragment ions are MSFragger will to to localize the to modifications are in search using the modification mass A.T. Avtonomov D.M. et of modified peptides using PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is a localization which the modification at site and which site the using the fragment ions in of the modification mass for labile searches. D. et and mass modification localization for the Proteome Res. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google which a to localize modifications and an of the localization those of MSFragger is in a for labile and conventional searches. labile search can be using the B. B. an proteomics data 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). for fragment ions of peptides been examination and of fragmentation within the of a method for for of an of the of labile mode search for labile modifications. this a is to peptides prior to tandem MS analysis The is labile, neutral loss of at collision the and loss of the at to collision S. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). a search methods struggle to identify RNA-crosslinked peptides fragment ions the modification site, expected to contain the are not identify their RNA-crosslinked peptides in the these the a spectrum strategy that is to a mass peptides that have the modification to be labile in addition to for modification fragment ions the in this a identification by matching many more ions in the spectrum and for localization of the modification site We a conventional search in MSFragger as a to a labile mode loss of the mode with fragment and a fragment to of the The labile mode searches dramatically the conventional and more spectra for the and methods have been used to search modification in conventional search such as the method of spectrum and mass used by et to search these data S. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). MSFragger labile mode provides such as the fragment ions that dramatically the of spectra identified, as as the flexibility to such in a this improved spectrum assignment to identification of more unique RNA-crosslinked peptides from more proteins to a conventional search with MSFragger labile modifications like these RNA-crosslinked peptides, and as for Nesvizhskii A.I. and comprehensive and analysis with Met. PubMed Scopus Google labile search to identify modified peptides to the of ions the intact modification that a search Fragment ions are they localization of the modification within the peptide, to intact modifications are in searches. modifications are as labile as these but labile search can still for labile modifications searches. is of the most PTMs, with an of is known that of and can acid in tandem MS, of and at collision R. Stuart S.S. Houel S. Ahn N.G. Old W.M. Large-scale examination of factors influencing phosphopeptide neutral loss during collision induced dissociation.J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015; 26: 1128-1142Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar, 8Everley R.A. Huttlin E.L. Erickson A.R. Beausoleil S.A. Gygi S.P. Neutral loss is a very common occurrence in phosphotyrosine-containing peptides labeled with isobaric tags.J. Proteome Res. 2017; 16: 1069-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar). many phosphopeptide searches are with conventional methods, many search engines the neutral loss of acid to the of phosphopeptide searches. peptides are often observed at and can in their ability to a of and neutral loss is typically observed in with the proportion of peptides in on the collision and factors of modification and loss is common to many labile modifications and presents a to search as will be peptides for which the observed fragmentation not the fragment ions expected by searches and not to labile searches. MSFragger labile search provides a to this for between the and labile to the for is accomplished by a modification and a mass of the mass and amino acid the peptide in a spectrum largely the the modification of the peptide will a the peptide largely the the labile mass will be to be in a search phosphopeptide peptides that contain can be by more than modification a mass to the mass of modifications. Mass searches are to a modification site for modifications, but labile modifications can be to of the modifications. the searches we a of peptide and of modifications and mass a of modifications to the of labile, and searches from of using in for the labile MSFragger searches that not localize during the search of modification-specific neutral we not to the neutral loss of acid in the localization in this the neutral loss of acid fragment to be in the MSFragger search to improve the spectrum identification from the peptide to the We the value of this labile search method for data from with fragmentation at and collision and and at the data of et MSFragger labile search a in a conventional search in which in identifies many more than the search of et with the search by the collision at which the data the of labile search a on the collision B. analysis of in 2017; Scopus Google Scholar). an of the labile and searches the conventional with and labile searches very similar and this collision peptides loss do searches that the with from a labile search the of the labile search more spectra than the conventional as the of are at this and this the labile search also the searches by to that the search strategy on the to which modifications are in a been to neutral loss by R.A. Huttlin E.L. Erickson A.R. Beausoleil S.A. Gygi S.P. Neutral loss is a very common occurrence in phosphotyrosine-containing peptides labeled with isobaric tags.J. Proteome Res. 2017; 16: 1069-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google to also a from the Methods for large with the of and labile searches. the collision and it is that the labile search the more phosphopeptide or an of to the conventional search The mode searches also improved to conventional as a of the in from peptides with of The and labile searches to more and to more than the search the value of loss in for at and proteins from and labile mode searches more and more from the data in the in a new and labile mode searches more and more from the data in the we ADP-ribosylated peptides to the of MSFragger labile search on a modification with of and from Analysis of is a of and it been that loss from is extremely common R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Mass spectrometry for Res. 2017; PubMed Scopus Google to many methods like to localize An strategy for comprehensive of using mass spectrometry-based 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, R. et of a method for the identification of the in and Proteome Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). have that a of fragment ions to resulting in of labile peptide and fragment R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and a of for that a for the search in the J.M. B. et using PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). to the search with conventional and mode MSFragger searches in the of ADP-ribosylated but with between the conventional and labile search as expected that which modifications is the the we a positive between and the of the mode search to conventional with mode search improved at but the The similar between conventional and MSFragger searches in the data is the of an in with search at and a at that the fragmentation is expected to from modifications in than in with labile searches are labile search methods can still in methods is or modifications are We also data from and a of and labile search improved conventional MSFragger with of in data and in with search similar in and in and We also the of and peptide ions in this and their in the labile and search in only with data and a fragment with a mass of to loss of from the R. et fragmentation of ADP-ribosylated and their in database Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). this fragment to the search in a in in but in as expected that in the The of this fragment for localization of the of in the data fragment and not be from data in or for can be by the and more using MSFragger labile Labile mode search in MSFragger provides a and of to identify spectra of peptides labile modifications. While the of in labile search to search scales with the used to fragment the peptide and the of the the mode search the spectrum assignment in nearly by for peptides with and modification for peptide and fragment a wide variety of labile modifications can be with The labile mode search can the fragment ions by fragment in Nesvizhskii A.I. for detection in spectra of modified Scopus Google labile mode to be used of fragmentation for new modifications. of labile modifications been a to and in PTMs fragment However, in many we can localize modifications using fragment as for and localization is also in and the ability to localize using neutral loss for localization of labile modifications MSFragger Labile search mode is in and along with in the with are for labile searches of phosphorylation and which can also be modified to of labile searches for modification of