Friedmann cosmology with decaying vacuum density in Brans–Dicke theory
C. P. Singh, Joan Solà
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we study Friedmann cosmology with time-varying vacuum energy density in the context of Brans–Dicke theory. We consider an isotropic and homogeneous flat space, filled with a matter-dominated perfect fluid and a dynamical cosmological term $$\varLambda (t) $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , obeying the equation of state of the vacuum. As the exact nature of a possible time-varying vacuum is yet to be found, we explore $$\varLambda (t)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> given by the phenomenological law $$\varLambda (t)=\lambda +\sigma H$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , where $$\lambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> and $$\sigma $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:math> are positive constants. We solve the model and then focus on two different cases $$\varLambda _{H1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> and $$\varLambda _{H2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> by assuming $$\varLambda =\lambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$\varLambda =\sigma H$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , respectively. Notice that $$\varLambda _{H1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is the analog of the standard $$\varLambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> CDM, but within the Brans–Dicke cosmology. We find the analytical solution of the main cosmological functions such as the Hubble parameter, the scale factor, deceleration and equation of state parameters for these models. In order to test the viability of the cosmological scenarios, we perform two sets of joint observational analyses of the recent Type Ia supernova data (Pantheon), observational measurements of Hubble parameter data, Baryon acoustic oscillation/Cosmic microwave background data and Local Hubble constant for each model. For the sake of comparison, the same data analysis is performed for the $$\varLambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> CDM model. Each model shows a transition from decelerated phase to accelerated phase and can be viewed as an effective quintessence behavior. Using the model selection criteria AIC and BIC to distinguish from existing dark energy models, we find that the Brans–Dicke analog of the $$\varLambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> -cosmology (i.e. our model $$\varLambda _{H1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ) performs at a level comparable to the standard $$\varLambda $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> CDM, whereas $$\varLambda _{H2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> is less favoured.