Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide Is Comparable to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE for PET/CT Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumours in the Latin-American Population
Arlette Haeger, Cristian Soza‐Ried, Vasko Kramer, Ana Hurtado de Mendoza, Elisabeth Eppard, Noémie Emmanuel, Johanna Wettlin, Horacio Amaral, René Fernández
Abstract
PET imaging of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) is well established for staging and therapy follow-up. The short half-life, increasing costs, and regulatory issues significantly limit the availability of approved imaging agents, such as [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide provides a similar biodistribution and tumour uptake, can be produced on a large scale and may improve access to precision imaging. Here we prospectively compared the clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide in the Latin-American population. Our results showed that in patients with stage IV NETs [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE presents higher physiological uptake than Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide in the liver, hypophysis, salivary glands, adrenal glands (all p < 0.001), pancreatic uncinated process, kidneys, and small intestine (all p < 0.05). Nevertheless, despite the lower background uptake of Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide, comparative analysis of tumour-to-liver (TLR) and tumour-to-spleen (TSR) showed no statistically significant difference for lesions in the liver, bone, lymph nodes, and other tissues. Only three discordant lesions in highly-metastases livers were detected by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE but not by Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide and only one discordant lesion was detected by Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide but not by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Non-inferiority analysis showed that Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide is comparable to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Hence, our results demonstrate that Al[18F]F-NOTA-Octreotide provided excellent image quality, visualized NET lesions with high sensitivity and represents a highly promising, clinical alternative to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.