Litcius/Paper detail

Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Anthony C Smith, Emma Thomas, Centaine L. Snoswell, Helen M. Haydon, Ateev Mehrotra, Jane Clemensen, Liam J Caffery

2020Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare1,874 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is again reminding us of the importance of using telehealth to deliver care, especially as means of reducing the risk of cross-contamination caused by close contact. For telehealth to be effective as part of an emergency response it first needs to become a routinely used part of our health system. Hence, it is time to step back and ask why telehealth is not mainstreamed. In this article, we highlight key requirements for this to occur. Strategies to ensure that telehealth is used regularly in acute, post-acute and emergency situations, alongside conventional service delivery methods, include flexible funding arrangements, training and accrediting our health workforce. Telehealth uptake also requires a significant change in management effort and the redesign of existing models of care. Implementing telehealth proactively rather than reactively is more likely to generate greater benefits in the long-term, and help with the everyday (and emergency) challenges in healthcare.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Telehealth2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PandemicCoronavirusMedicineBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsMedical emergencyTelemedicineDiseaseVirologyOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)Health carePolitical scienceInternal medicineLawTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) | Litcius