Data flow in clinical laboratories: could metadata and peridata bridge the gap to new AI-based applications?
Andrea Padoan, Janne Cadamuro, Glynis Frans, Federico Cabitza, Alexander Tolios, Sander De Bruyne, William van Doorn, Johannes Elias, Željko Debeljak, Salomón Martín Pérez, Habib Özdemir, Anna Carobene
Abstract
In the last decades, clinical laboratories have significantly advanced their technological capabilities, through the use of interconnected systems and advanced software. Laboratory Information Systems (LIS), introduced in the 1970s, have transformed into sophisticated information technology (IT) components that integrate with various digital tools, enhancing data retrieval and exchange. However, the current capabilities of LIS are not sufficient to rapidly save the extensive data, generated during the total testing process (TTP), beyond just test results. This opinion paper discusses qualitative types of TTP data, proposing how to divide laboratory-generated information into two categories, namely metadata and peridata. Being both metadata and peridata information derived from the testing process, it is proposed that the first is useful to describe the characteristics of data, while the second is for interpretation of test results. Together with standardizing preanalytical coding, the subdivision of laboratory-generated information into metadata or peridata might enhance ML studies, also by facilitating the adherence of laboratory-derived data to the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability (FAIR) principles. Finally, integrating metadata and peridata into LIS can improve data usability, support clinical utility, and advance AI model development in healthcare, emphasizing the need for standardized data management practices.