The reading the mind in the eyes test short form (A & B): validation and outcomes in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cohort
Tom Burke, Marta Pinto‐Grau, Emmet Costello, Colm Peelo, Katie Lonergan, Mark Heverin, Orla Hardiman, Niall Pender
Abstract
Objective: Deficits in social cognition are part of the cognitive phenotype of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study investigated the psychometric properties and test-retest reliability of two short-form versions of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Method: Patients with ALS (n = 50), alongside age and IQ matched controls (n = 50) were recruited. The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) was apportioned according to previously published psychometric properties yielding two short forms. The internal consistency, test–retest reliability, item difficulty, and discrimination coefficient were computed to determine the utility of the short forms. Two one-sided t-test (TOST) assessed equivalency, and a ROC curve analysis determined a cutoff for impairment. Results: Cronbach’s Alpha > 0.7 was observed for the RMET Short Form A and RMET Short Form B, indicating adequate internal consistency. Both RMET Short Forms had excellent psychometric properties when discriminating between ALS patients who performed well, compared to those who did not, with an overall medium difficulty coefficient observed. The TOST found the short forms to be equivalent. Conclusion: Social cognition is an important cognitive construct in ALS, as is its measurement. This study contributes not only to the psychometric knowledge of this measure, but also to the usability, efficacy, reliability, and repeatability of two short forms.