Carbon Nanotube SRAM in 5-nm Technology Node Design, Optimization, and Performance Evaluation—Part II: CNT Interconnect Optimization

Abstract

The size and parameter optimization for the 5-nm carbon nanotube field effect transistor (CNFET) static random access memory (SRAM) cell was presented in Part I of this article. Based on that work, we propose a carbon nanotube (CNT) SRAM array composed of the schematically optimized CNFET SRAM and CNT interconnects. We consider the interconnects inside the CNFET SRAM cell composed of metallic single-wall CNT (M-SWCNT) bundles to represent the metal layers 0 and 1 (M0 and M1). We investigate the layout structure of CNFET SRAM cell considering CNFET devices, M-SWCNT interconnects, and metal electrode Palladium with CNT (Pd-CNT) contacts. Two versions of cell layout designs are explored and compared in terms of performance, stability, and power efficiency. Furthermore, we implement a 16 Kbit SRAM array composed of the proposed CNFET SRAM cells, multiwall CNT (MWCNTs) inter-cell interconnects and Pd-CNT contacts. Such an array shows significant advantages, with the read and write overall energy-delay product (EDP), static power consumption, and core area of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.28\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> , <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.52\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> , and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.76\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> respectively to 7-nm FinFET-SRAM array with copper interconnects, whereas the read and write static noise margins are 6% and 12% respectively larger than the FinFET counterpart.

Topics & Concepts