Litcius/Paper detail

<i>En Bloc</i> Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety, Recurrence and Histopathology

Takafumi Yanagisawa, Keiichiro Mori, Reza Sari Motlagh, Tatsushi Kawada, Hadi Mostafaei, Fahad Quhal, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Pawel Rajwa, Abdulmajeed Aydh, Frederik König, Maximilian Pallauf, Benjamin Pradere, David D'Andrea, Eva Compérat, Jun Miki, Takahiro Kimura, Shin Egawa, Shahrokh F. Shariat

2022The Journal of Urology65 citationsDOI

Abstract

PURPOSE: resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: resection with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors. RESULTS: resection had a lower rate of residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection than those treated with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors in 1 randomized controlled trial and 3 observational studies (pooled RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: resection for bladder tumors seems to be safer, and to yield superior histopathological information and performance compared to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Despite the failure to improve the recurrence rate, the more accurate histopathological analysis is likely to improve clinical decision making and care delivery in nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineHistopathologyResectionBladder tumorHistopathological examinationRadiologyDifferential diagnosisDifferential effectsSurgeryUrologyUrinary bladderTherapeutic effectStandard of careClinical trialBladder cancerBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
<i>En Bloc</i> Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety, Recurrence and Histopathology | Litcius