Litcius/Paper detail

Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations

Pierre‐François Loos, Massimiliano Comin, Xavier Blase, Denis Jacquemin

2021Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation140 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

With the aim of completing our previous efforts devoted to local and Rydberg transitions in organic compounds, we provide a series of highly accurate vertical transition energies for intramolecular charge-transfer transitions occurring in (π-conjugated) molecular compounds. To this end, we apply a composite protocol consisting of linear-response CCSDT excitation energies determined with Dunning’s double-ζ basis set corrected by CC3/CCSDT-3 energies obtained with the corresponding triple-ζ basis. Further basis set corrections (up to aug-cc-pVQZ) are obtained at the CCSD and CC2 levels. We report 30 transitions obtained in 17 compounds (aminobenzonitrile, aniline, azulene, benzonitrile, benzothiadiazole, dimethylaminobenzonitrile, dimethylaniline, dipeptide, β-dipeptide, hydrogen chloride, nitroaniline, nitrobenzene, nitrodimethylaniline, nitropyridine N-oxide, N-phenylpyrrole, phthalazine, and quinoxaline]. These reference values are then used to benchmark a series of wave functions [CIS(D), SOPPA, RPA(D), EOM-MP2, CC2, CCSD, CCSD(T)(a)*, CCSDR(3), CCSDT-3, CC3, ADC(2), ADC(3), and ADC(2.5)], the Green’s function-based Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism performed on top of the partially self-consistent evGW scheme considering two different starting points (BSE/evGW@HF and BSE/evGW@PBE0), and time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT) combined with several exchange-correlation functionals (B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, LC-ωHPBE, ωB97X, ωB97X-D, and M11). It turns out that the CC methods including triples, namely, CCSD(T)(a)*, CCSDR(3), CCSDT-3, and CC3, provide rather small average deviations (≤0.10 eV), with CC3 emerging as the only chemically accurate approach. ADC(2.5) also performs nicely with a mean absolute error of 0.11 eV for a O(N6) formal scaling, whereas CC2 and BSE/evGW@PBE0 also deliver very satisfying results given their respective O(N5) and O(N4) computational scalings. In the TD-DFT context, the best performing functional is ωB97X-D, closely followed by CAM-B3LYP and M06-2X, all providing mean absolute errors around 0.15 eV relative to the theoretical best estimates.

Topics & Concepts

Intramolecular forceRydberg formulaBasis setPhysicsExcitationOmegaFormalism (music)ChemistryAtomic physicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanicsIonMoleculeIonizationArtMusicalVisual artsPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations | Litcius